On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The model number stored in the struct da9063 is the same for all
> variants of the da9063 since it is the chip ID, which is always
> the same. Replace that with a separate identifier instead, which
> allows us to discern the DA9063 variants by setting the type
> based on either DT match or otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static int da9063_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, da9063);
> da9063->dev = &i2c->dev;
> da9063->chip_irq = i2c->irq;
> + da9063->type = (enum da9063_type)id->driver_data;
Nit: I think this cast (from unsigned long) is not needed.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
