Trivial, but still: the failed symlink is not *for* the channel but a link *to* the channel. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Found this while adding a similar message to the demux driver. drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c index 9669ca4937b8..300ab4b672e4 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ int i2c_mux_add_adapter(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, snprintf(symlink_name, sizeof(symlink_name), "channel-%u", chan_id); WARN(sysfs_create_link(&muxc->dev->kobj, &priv->adap.dev.kobj, symlink_name), - "can't create symlink for channel %u\n", chan_id); + "can't create symlink to channel %u\n", chan_id); dev_info(&parent->dev, "Added multiplexed i2c bus %d\n", i2c_adapter_id(&priv->adap)); -- 2.11.0
