On 2018-04-30 17:32, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:31:39AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> If the bridge supplier is unbound, this will bring the bridge consumer >> down along with the bridge. Thus, there will no longer linger any >> dangling pointers from the bridge consumer (the drm_device) to some >> non-existent bridge supplier. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Minus the ->owner bikeshed I brought up in the previous patch I agree with > this approach as the best way to move forward for now. > > Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> Thanks, let's see if Laurent is also on-board... > One small suggestion below, for merging I'd say pls get Jyri's > review/tested-by too, since you're both working on the same problem it > seems. Yes, I too would be very happy to see a tested-by from someone. > Aside: Do you want commit rights to drm-misc to be able to push work like > this? If that makes life easier, sure. Cheers, Peter
