Hi Wolfram, On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> That should have been caught by the !soc check above, and have already >> returned with -ENODEV. > > Now I get it: You mean non-0 check, not non-NULL check... soc->data _is_ a pointer. You only cast it to an integer on the next line. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds