Hi Wolfram,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> That should have been caught by the !soc check above, and have already
>> returned with -ENODEV.
>
> Now I get it: You mean non-0 check, not non-NULL check...
soc->data _is_ a pointer. You only cast it to an integer on the next line.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
