Hi Heikki, Thank you for the comments! > From: Heikki Krogerus, Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:02 PM > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:15:23AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > > > + host_node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "renesas,host", 0); > > > > + if (!host_node) > > > > + return -ENODEV; > > > > + > > > > + pdev_host = of_find_device_by_node(host_node); > > > > + if (!pdev_host) > > > > + return -ENODEV; > > > > + > > > > + of_node_put(host_node); > > > > > > Isn't what Heikki tried to solve with graphs and stuff like that? > > > > Heikki prepared "device connection" framework (devcon) [1] to get a device pointer. > > However, IIUC, we need to improve the framework for device tree environment because: > > - The devcon needs each dev_name() through the endpoint array of struct device_connection. > > - Each dev_name() on device tree environment will be <base address register>.<device name>, > > f.e. "ee020000.usb". So, I don???t think adding such strings to a driver is a good way. > > That is how the build-in connection descriptions are handled, but in > this case you want to describe them in your bindings, and to do that you > should use remote-endpoints, ie. OF graph bindings: bindings/graph.txt I understood it. As I mentioned other thread, I'll try to use the usb-connector bindings. > > So, I wrote such a code by using existing APIs. > > Should I improve the framework first somehow? Or, is my understanding incorrect? > > You don't necessarily need to propose any changes to the device > connection framework at this point, but you do need to use graph for > describing that connection. Once we add device graph handling to the > device connection framework, it is no problem to update this driver. I got it. > Of course, if you have time and interest in preparing a proposal for > graph handling to the device connection framework, I would appreciate > it. I'll try to add graph handling to the device connection framework by end of next week. If failed, I'll inform in this thread. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda > > Thanks, > > -- > heikki