Hi Sergei,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:02:39PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 04/10/2018 01:54 PM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
>
> > From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add the LVDS device to r8a77970.dtsi in a disabled state. Also connect
> > the it to the LVDS output of the DU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - Rebased on the modified endpoint name and changed patch subject to
> > comply with other patches in the series from Sergei.
>
> Stop, what was wrong with my R8A77970 LVDS patch, reposted on the popular
> demand? :-)
>
Nothing wrong, I found out about your right now.
I see a very small difference as
lvds@feb90000 vs lvds-encoder@feb90000
You can add your signed-off-by ofc if you think that's the case.
Thanks
j
> MBR, Sergei
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
