Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] sh_eth: add sh_eth_cpu_data::no_xdfar flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/01/2018 12:22 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> The commit 6ded286555c2 ("sh_eth: Fix RX recovery on R-Car in case of RX
> ring underrun") added a check for an bad RDFAR offset in sh_eth_rx(), so
> that the code could work on the R-Car Ether controllers which don't have
> this register (and TDFAR), then the commit 3365711df02 ("sh_eth: WARN on

   Oops, only 11 digits! Should have been 3365711df024. :-)

> access to a register not implemented in a particular chip") replaced
> offset 0 with 0xffff. Adding/checking the 'no_xdfar' bit field in the
> 'struct sh_eth_cpu_data' instead results in less object code...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

MBR, Sergei



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux