Re: [PATCH v13 2/2] rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Niklas,

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:01:32AM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> +	switch (priv->lanes) {
> +	case 1:
> +		phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK | PHYCNT_ENABLE_0;
> +		break;
> +	case 2:
> +		phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK | PHYCNT_ENABLE_1 | PHYCNT_ENABLE_0;
> +		break;
> +	case 4:
> +		phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK | PHYCNT_ENABLE_3 | PHYCNT_ENABLE_2 |
> +			PHYCNT_ENABLE_1 | PHYCNT_ENABLE_0;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

I guess you could have a simpler construct here using this:

phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK;

switch (priv->lanes) {
case 4:
	phycnt |= PHYCNT_ENABLE_3 | PHYCNT_ENABLE_2;
case 2:
	phycnt |= PHYCNT_ENABLE_1;
case 1:
	phycnt |= PHYCNT_ENABLE_0;
	break;

default:
	return -EINVAL;
}

But that's really up to you.

> +static int rcar_csi2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	const struct soc_device_attribute *attr;
> +	struct rcar_csi2 *priv;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	priv->info = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +
> +	/* r8a7795 ES1.x behaves different then ES2.0+ but no own compat */
> +	attr = soc_device_match(r8a7795es1);
> +	if (attr)
> +		priv->info = attr->data;
> +
> +	priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> +	mutex_init(&priv->lock);
> +	priv->stream_count = 0;
> +
> +	ret = rcar_csi2_probe_resources(priv, pdev);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to get resources\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> +
> +	ret = rcar_csi2_parse_dt(priv);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	priv->subdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +	priv->subdev.dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	v4l2_subdev_init(&priv->subdev, &rcar_csi2_subdev_ops);
> +	v4l2_set_subdevdata(&priv->subdev, &pdev->dev);
> +	snprintf(priv->subdev.name, V4L2_SUBDEV_NAME_SIZE, "%s %s",
> +		 KBUILD_MODNAME, dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> +	priv->subdev.flags = V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE;
> +
> +	priv->subdev.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_PIXEL_FORMATTER;
> +	priv->subdev.entity.ops = &rcar_csi2_entity_ops;
> +
> +	priv->pads[RCAR_CSI2_SINK].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK;
> +	for (i = RCAR_CSI2_SOURCE_VC0; i < NR_OF_RCAR_CSI2_PAD; i++)
> +		priv->pads[i].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> +
> +	ret = media_entity_pads_init(&priv->subdev.entity, NR_OF_RCAR_CSI2_PAD,
> +				     priv->pads);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto error;
> +
> +	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);

Is CONFIG_PM mandatory on Renesas SoCs? If not, you end up with the
device uninitialised at probe, and pm_runtime_get_sync will not
initialise it either if CONFIG_PM is not enabled. I guess you could
call your runtime_resume function unconditionally, and mark the device
as active in runtime_pm using pm_runtime_set_active.

Looks good otherwise, once fixed (and if relevant):
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux