Re: [PATCH 0/2] sh_eth: unify the SoC feature checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sh_eth: unify the SoC feature checks
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 23:30:08 +0300
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <d150c423-8e86-822f-a16b-b0fc0d717543@cogentembedded.com>
Organization: Cogent Embedded
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 03/24/2018 11:14 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> Should have been 0/5 in the subject. Sorry. :-)

   Oh, and I forgot 'net-next' inside [], sorry again! :-)

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] sh_eth: unify the SoC feature checks
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] sh_eth: unify the SoC feature checks
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sh_eth: add sh_eth_cpu_data::no_tx_cntr flag
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: r8a77965: Add PWM device nodes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sh_eth: unify the SoC feature checks
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sh_eth: unify the SoC feature checks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SOC] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux