On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:45:36PM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote: > Hi! > > I have run the tests on a Renesas R-Car M3-W's DU device, and have found a > number of false negatives that mostly stem from use of Intel-specifics > without checking if that makes sense first. So here's a bunch of fixes for > those, hope they are generic enough for upstreaming. Nice, other people using this! Do you plan to maintain this actively going forward, or is this more a one-off effort? If you're planning to stick around we'd be happy to fix you up with commit rights to make this all a bit smoother (after a few of your patches have been merged ofc). Cheers, Daniel > > CU > Uli > > > Ulrich Hecht (8): > tests/kms_addfb_basic: skip i915-specific tests on other platforms > tests/kms_panel_fitting: check for i915 before checking version > lib/igt_gt: has_gpu_reset(): fix failed assertion on non-i915 > platforms > lib/igt_gt: check for presence of GPU reset before using it > tests/kms_plane_lowres: skip i915-specific tests on other platforms > lib/igt_pm: turn absence of autosuspend_delay_ms from fail to skip > tests/kms_addfb_basic: size_tests(): reduce test buffer size > test/kms_addfb_basic: tolerate absence of 8-bit format > > lib/igt_gt.c | 24 ++++++++++++++---------- > lib/igt_pm.c | 2 +- > tests/kms_addfb_basic.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- > tests/kms_panel_fitting.c | 1 + > tests/kms_plane_lowres.c | 1 + > 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
