Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] i2c: demux: Use changeset helpers for clarity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Why? ePAPR says "okay", "disabled", "fail", or "fail-sss".
> > 
> > Sorry for missing this in the previous round.
> 
> That was per Wolfram's request, and because the existing code uses "ok". I'm 
> personally fine with any.

I did? Well, today I don't have a strong preference. Any is fine with
me, too.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux