Re: Warning for possible circular locking dependecy on v4.16-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:40:36PM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> On 2018-02-12 21:12:48 +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
>> > Hi Geert,
>> >
>> > When doing some testing on v4.16-rc1 I ran across this warning a couple
>> > of times. I was using the renesas_config from the current master branch
>> > of renesas-drivers at the time. It do not hit every time but in my
>> > limited testing I would say ~50%.
>>
>> I forgot to mention this was on H3 ES2.0.
>
> FWIIW, I have also observed this (once so far).

Is this the same false positive as:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/17/34
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg61425.html

?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux