On 01/12/2018 01:43 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
The internal LVDS encoders now have their own DT bindings, representing
them as part of the DU is deprecated.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt | 26
+++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt index
cd48aba3bc8c..8f6e0e118e3e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
[...]
@@ -71,7 +68,7 @@ Example: R8A7795 (R-Car H3) ES2.0 DU
compatible = "renesas,du-r8a7795";
reg = <0 0xfeb00000 0 0x80000>,
<0 0xfeb90000 0 0x14>;
- reg-names = "du", "lvds.0";
+ reg-names = "du";
Since "reg-names" list is changed, I believe you'd like to update
the "reg" property value as well.
Good point, I'll fix it.
Could you also totally drop "reg-names"? Or is that a strong requirement
now? I mostly dislike how this memory region is named in /proc/iomem... :-)
[...]
MBR, Sergei
