Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: display: renesas: Deprecate LVDS support in the DU bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/12/2018 01:43 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

The internal LVDS encoders now have their own DT bindings, representing
them as part of the DU is deprecated.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

  .../devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt     | 26
  +++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt index
cd48aba3bc8c..8f6e0e118e3e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
[...]
@@ -71,7 +68,7 @@ Example: R8A7795 (R-Car H3) ES2.0 DU
  		compatible = "renesas,du-r8a7795";
  		reg = <0 0xfeb00000 0 0x80000>,
  		      <0 0xfeb90000 0 0x14>;
-		reg-names = "du", "lvds.0";
+		reg-names = "du";

Since "reg-names" list is changed, I believe you'd like to update
the "reg" property value as well.

Good point, I'll fix it.

Could you also totally drop "reg-names"? Or is that a strong requirement now? I mostly dislike how this memory region is named in /proc/iomem... :-)

[...]

MBR, Sergei



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux