Hi Laurent,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:58 AM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The Renesas R-Car Gen2 and Gen3 SoCs have internal LVDS encoders. Add
> corresponding device tree bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,lvds.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
> +Renesas R-Car LVDS Encoder
> +==========================
> +
> +These DT bindings describe the LVDS encoder embedded in the Renesas R-Car Gen2
> +and Gen3 SoCs.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : Shall contain one of
> + - "renesas,lvds-r8a7743" for R8A7790 (R-Car RZ/G1M) compatible LVDS encoders
> + - "renesas,lvds-r8a7790" for R8A7790 (R-Car H2) compatible LVDS encoders
> + - "renesas,lvds-r8a7791" for R8A7791 (R-Car M2-W) compatible LVDS encoders
> + - "renesas,lvds-r8a7793" for R8A7791 (R-Car M2-N) compatible LVDS encoders
> + - "renesas,lvds-r8a7795" for R8A7795 (R-Car H3) compatible LVDS encoders
> + - "renesas,lvds-r8a7796" for R8A7796 (R-Car M3-W) compatible LVDS encoders
As this is a new binding, please use "renesas,<soc>-lvds".
BTW, would it make sense to use "renesas,<soc>-du" for the new DU binding, too?
Or have you reserved that for the future version that will have a one-to-one
mapping between device nodes and DU channels? ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
