Hi Rafael,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> One of the limitations of pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() is that
> if a parent driver wants to use these functions, all of its child
> drivers have to do that too because of the parent usage counter
> manipulations necessary to get the correct state of the parent during
> system-wide transitions to the working state (system resume).
> However, that limitation turns out to be artificial, so remove it.
>
> Namely, pm_runtime_force_suspend() only needs to update the children
> counter of its parent (if there's is a parent) when the device can
> stay in suspend after the subsequent system resume transition, as
> that counter is correct already otherwise. Now, if the parent's
> children counter is not updated, it is not necessary to increment
> the parent's usage counter in that case any more, as long as the
> children counters of devices are checked along with their usage
> counters in order to decide whether or not the devices may be left
> in suspend after the subsequent system resume transition.
>
> Accordingly, modify pm_runtime_force_suspend() to only call
> pm_runtime_set_suspended() for devices whose usage and children
> counters are at the "no references" level (the runtime PM status
> of the device needs to be updated to "suspended" anyway in case
> this function is called once again for the same device during the
> transition under way), drop the parent usage counter incrementation
> from it and update pm_runtime_force_resume() to compensate for these
> changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
This patch causes a regression during system resume on Renesas Salvator-XS
with R-Car H3 ES2.0:
SError Interrupt on CPU3, code 0xbf000002 -- SError
SError Interrupt on CPU2, code 0xbf000002 -- SError
CPU: 3 PID: 1769 Comm: kworker/u16:13 Not tainted
4.15.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05338-gf14cf570a813c9ca-dirty #97
CPU: 2 PID: 1774 Comm: kworker/u16:18 Not tainted
4.15.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05338-gf14cf570a813c9ca-dirty #97
Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on
r8a7795 ES2.0+ (DT)
Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on
r8a7795 ES2.0+ (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_init+0x34/0xf8
pc : rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_init+0x34/0xf8
lr : phy_init+0x64/0xcc
lr : phy_init+0x64/0xcc
...
Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt
Note that before, it printed a warning instead:
Enabling runtime PM for inactive device (ee0a0200.usb-phy) with
active children
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1741 at drivers/base/power/runtime.c:1300
pm_runtime_enable+0x94/0xd8
Reverting commit 0408584d580d4a2c ("PM / runtime: Rework
pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume()") fixes the crash.
Note that applying Ulf's "[PATCH v2 0/3] phy: core: Re-work runtime PM
deployment and fix an issue"
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg21719.html) instead
does not fix the crash.
With more debug code added, it seems the EHCI module clocks (701-703) are
enabled earlier than before. I guess this triggers the workqueue to perform
an operation while another related device (HSUSB 704?) is still disabled?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
