>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >>> [Ulf: Converted to use the WAKEUP_PATH driver PM flag] > > Ulf: + killing the DEV_PM_OPS define, increasing kernel size if PM_SUSPEND=n? Oh, yes - correct! The code looks nicer, with the penalty of one static struct declared and not used, in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is unset. Should I revert back to your proposal, I am fine with whatever? [...] Kind regards Uffe
