Hi Vladimir,
Thank you for your review.
I will re-spin this patch.
Thanks,
Kaneko
2017-12-25 17:35 GMT+09:00 Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 12/24/2017 03:37 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
>> From: Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch adds an implementation that saves and restores the state of
>> GPIO configuration on suspend and resume.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> [Modify structure of the bank info to simplify a saving registers]
>> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> [snip]
>
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(gpio_rcar_pm_ops,
>> + gpio_rcar_suspend, gpio_rcar_resume);
>> +#define DEV_PM_OPS (&gpio_rcar_pm_ops)
>> +#else
>> +#define DEV_PM_OPS NULL
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP*/
>> +
>> static int gpio_rcar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct gpio_rcar_priv *p;
>> @@ -536,6 +604,7 @@ static int gpio_rcar_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> .remove = gpio_rcar_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "gpio_rcar",
>> + .pm = DEV_PM_OPS,
>> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(gpio_rcar_of_table),
>> }
>> };
>>
>
> You can safely follow the next simpler pattern (add pm functions after
> gpio_rcar_remove() function and remove DEV_PM_OPS macro):
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int gpio_rcar_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> ...
> }
>
> static int gpio_rcar_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> ...
> }
> #endif
>
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(gpio_rcar_pm_ops, gpio_rcar_suspend, gpio_rcar_resume);
>
> static struct platform_driver gpio_rcar_device_driver = {
> .probe = gpio_rcar_probe,
> .remove = gpio_rcar_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "gpio_rcar",
> .pm = &gpio_rcar_pm_ops,
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(gpio_rcar_of_table),
> }
> };
>
> --
> With best wishes,
> Vladimir
