Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PM / core: Add IN_BAND_WAKEUP driver flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ulf,

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 14 December 2017 at 11:52, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 11 December 2017 at 11:48, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 10 December 2017 at 11:16, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> To complicate matters, some drivers may be used on SoCs where the device
>>>>>> needs to be kept running (clock and/or power domain), and on SoCs where the
>>>>>> device is always running. This difference is typically handled by genpd,
>>>>>> and the device driver may not even be aware. Of course the driver can just
>>>>>> set IN_BAND_WAKEUP regardless, (else it has to check for the presence of
>>>>>> clocks and/or power-domains properties itself, duplicating genpd
>>>>>> core/driver code).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what about
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          if (IN_BAND_WAKEUP ||
>>>>>>             (GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP && !OUT_BAND_WAKEUP)) {
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't want to suspend the device in case of IN_BAND_WAKEUP, right!?
>>>>>
>>>>>>                 ... suspend device...
>>>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>> Oops, inverted logic. I should not write technical emails on Sunday morning.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the device must be kept awake if either IN_BAND_WAKEUP is set, or
>>>> if GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP is set but OUT_BAND_WAKEUP isn't.
>>>
>>> Putting together the pieces of information received here, you have
>>> convinced me that we should stick to use the current
>>> GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP for now, which allows genpds to opt-in for
>>> start dealing with in-band-wakeups.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> So I'll move forward with "[PATCH v2 0/3] PM / Domain: renesas: Fix active
>> wakeup behavior"
>> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg19941.html)
>
> Yes! I just added my reviewed-by tag to these.

Thanks a lot!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux