On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:34:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The confusing part here is that for most[*] subsystems, patches touching > only DT bindings should have a "dt-bindings" prefix, while patches touching > both DT bindings and driver code should have the drivers' subsystem prefix. > [*] I think you're about the only maintainer who insists on patches touching > only DT bindings having the drivers' subsystem prefix, which people tend to > forget, if they're even aware of that rule... > Can we improve this? This is something Rob's been pushing which seems like a step back to me so I've been pushing back on it - it's causing problems for me spotting things I need to look at and later on in review (including my scripting, which does pay attention to subject lines). I suspect I'm at the upper end of people getting lots of irrelevant stuff in copy which doesn't help here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
