Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7796: move nodes which have no reg property out of bus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Simon,

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For now I've applied the following:
>
> From: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:24:35 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7796: move nodes which have no reg
>  property out of bus
>
> Move pmu_a5[73], timer and thermal-zones nodes from soc node to root node.
> The nodes that have been moved do not have any register properties and thus
> shouldn't be placed on the bus.

> index c1b0d0344329..e82b4db1ad1a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi
> @@ -154,6 +154,23 @@
>                 clock-frequency = <0>;
>         };
>
> +       pmu_a57 {
> +               compatible = "arm,cortex-a57-pmu";
> +               interrupts-extended = <&gic GIC_SPI 72 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                     <&gic GIC_SPI 73 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +               interrupt-affinity = <&a57_0>,
> +                                    <&a57_1>;

Merge?

> +       };
> +
> +       pmu_a53 {
> +               compatible = "arm,cortex-a53-pmu";
> +               interrupts-extended = <&gic GIC_SPI 84 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                     <&gic GIC_SPI 85 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                     <&gic GIC_SPI 86 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                     <&gic GIC_SPI 87 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +               interrupt-affinity = <&a53_0>, <&a53_1>, <&a53_2>, <&a53_3>;

Thanks!

> +       };

> @@ -2027,4 +1968,56 @@
>                         resets = <&cpg 822>;
>                 };
>         };
> +
> +       timer {
> +               compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> +               interrupts-extended = <&gic GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +                                     <&gic GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +                                     <&gic GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +                                     <&gic GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;

Much better!

Or even

> +               interrupts-extended =
> +                       <&gic GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +                       <&gic GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +                       <&gic GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +                       <&gic GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;

I don't care that much, it extends beyond 80 characters anyway.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux