Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That together with an option of allowing "consumed resource-devices"
> (irqchip) to be included in the wakeup path. I am thinking, perhaps
> another driver PM flag (DPM_FLAG_WAKEUP_PATH), that the PM core looks
> at and sets ->power.wakeup_path flag for the device and its parents.
This is complicated by the fact that currently the device and irq
subsystems don't really share data. E.g. {en,dis}able_irq_wake() and
irq_set_irq_wake() don't take a device parameter, only an interrupt number,
and conversion from interrupt numbers to devices is non-trivial.
That's why I handled it in the irqchip drivers in the series referenced
below.
> [1]
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg19947.html
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
