Re: Possible regression due to "arm64: renesas: salvator: set driver type for eMMC"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> While I think it could be that the early ES1.0 boards might have different eMMC
> chips...

FTR, my boards have:

Salvator-X with H3 ES1.0:
    mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
    mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 BGSD3R 29.1 GiB

Salvator-X with M3-W ES1.0:

    mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
    mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 eMMC   28.8 GiB

Salvator-XS with H3 ES2.0:

    mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
    mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 BGSD3R 29.1 GiB

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux