2017-11-27 19:05 GMT+01:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Bartosz, > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt | 2 +- > > I just noticed this file is missing in the AT24 entry in MAINTAINERS. I > wanted to prepare a patch for that but then I was wondering if the name > "eeprom.txt" is really suitable? I have doubts. Would "at24.txt" be a > better name maybe? Rob? > > Kind regards, > > Wolfram > Yes, it definitely should be called at24.txt - especially that we have the legacy eeprom module in drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom.c which has nothing to do with the bindings in eeprom.txt. Acked-in-advance-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> Thanks, Bartosz
