On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:43:18AM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> Here's CAN and CAN FD support for the R-Car D3. This is a by-the-datasheet > >> implementation, with the datasheet missing some bits, namely the pin map. > >> I filled in the gaps with frog DNA^W^W^Wby deducing the information from > >> pin numbers already in the PFC driver, so careful scrutiny is advised. > >> > >> CU > >> Uli > >> > >> > >> Ulrich Hecht (7): > >> pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77995: Add CAN support > >> pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77995: Add CAN FD support > >> arm64: dts: r8a77995: Add CAN external clock support > >> arm64: dts: r8a77995: Add CAN support > >> arm64: dts: r8a77995: Add CAN FD support > >> can: rcar_can: document r8a77995 (R-Car D3) compatibility strings > >> can: rcar_canfd: document r8a77995 (R-Car D3) compatibility strings > > > > Hi Ulrich, > > > > is it safe, from a regression point of view, to apply the dts patches > > to a tree that does not have the other patches present? > > I believe it is. Thanks. I have applied them for v4.16.
