Hi Simon, On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add r8a7795 IPMMU nodes and keep all disabled by default. > > This includes all IPMMU devices for r8a7795 ES2.0. Those > not present in r8a7795 ES1.x are removed from the DT for those > SoCs using delete-node. A follow-up patch will add IPMMU devices > to ES1.x which are not also present in ES2.0. > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v5 [Simon Horman] > * Correct ES1.x override for ipmmu_vc0 > * Add ES1.x override for ipmmu_vc1 > * Drop mostly redundant comments from nodes > * Add power domains > * Consistently mark all nodes as disabled Thanks for the update! Looks like "power-domains" do work for IOMMU nodes. However, adding them seems to postpone initialization of the IOMMUs. With the two typos below fixed: Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi > + ipmmu_vc0: mmu@fe6b0000 { > + compatible = "renesas,ipmmu-r8a7795"; > + reg = <0 0xfe6b0000 0 0x1000>; > + renesas,ipmmu-main = <&ipmmu_mm 12>; > + power-domains = <&sysc R8A7795_PD_A3VP>; R8A7795_PD_A3VC > + #iommu-cells = <1>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + ipmmu_vc1: mmu@fe6f0000 { > + compatible = "renesas,ipmmu-r8a7795"; > + reg = <0 0xfe6f0000 0 0x1000>; > + renesas,ipmmu-main = <&ipmmu_mm 13>; > + power-domains = <&sysc R8A7795_PD_A3VP>; R8A7795_PD_A3VC > + #iommu-cells = <1>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds