> In general, I'll pick up any patches that are good, This is usual. > but the current track record is that Markus' patches need extra scrutiny, I find that this can be fine according to a safe review for presented update suggestions. > and many of the patches contain subjective changes that lead to debate Some discussion is occasionally needed to achieve the desired change acceptance, isn't it? > that is not constructive. I got an other opinion here. > There's no return on investment here. I hope that the view can become more positive. How will the clarification evolve further? Regards, Markus
