On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add fallback compatibility strings for R-Car Gen 1, 2 and 3. > > In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of > SoCs, f.e. Gen 1 and 2. But beyond that its not clear what the relationship > between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that r8a7790 is older > than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a descendant of the > former or vice versa. > > We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the > hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears > to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation. > > For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a > per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for > drivers for Renesas SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/tmio_mmc.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/tmio_mmc.txt > @@ -47,7 +57,7 @@ Optional properties: > Example: R8A7779 (R-Car H1) SDHI controller nodes Ah, so "R8A7790 (R-Car H2)" was intended in the previous patch... > > sdhi0: sd@ee100000 { > - compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r8a7790"; > + compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r8a7790", "renesas,rcar-gen2-sdhi"; > reg = <0 0xee100000 0 0x328>; > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 165 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > clocks = <&mstp3_clks R8A7790_CLK_SDHI0>; Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds