Hi Russell, Nicolas, On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 01:33:25PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [171003 11:32]: >> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > >>> Please send it to RMK's patch system. >> > >> >> > >> Done (I hope so ;-) >> > > >> > > Failed. Retrying. >> > >> > Yiha ;-) >> > >> > http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8702/1 >> >> This also fixes the spamming I started seeing with next-20171009: >> >> Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > It's all nice and good that people are testing this patch, but I can't > apply it to -rc1, nor my "misc" branch. It appears that this is due > to patches going through other trees. > > Sorry, I can't take this patch. > > (This is the falicy about any one particular tree having rights to > exclusively own a sub-tree in the kernel...) So through which tree did this end up in -next? Apparently Nicolas committed 9520b1a1b5f7a348 ("ARM: head-common.S: speed up startup code") himself, and then asked me to send the fix for that commit to Russell anyway? The commit above is actually in Russell's git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm.git#for-next. Russell, you did merge it yourself into for-next in commit 476242482bdee72b ("Merge branch 'xip_zdata' of http://git.linaro.org/people/nicolas.pitre/linux into devel-testing"). My patch applies fine against your for-next branch. So I fail to see why you can't take this patch? Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
