Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: firmware: psci: Add psci_is_available()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:03:01 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> PSCI support may be disabled at build time (by configuration) or at
> run-time (PSCI firmware not present).  While CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW can be
> used to check for build time enablement, there is currently no simple
> way to check if PSCI is actually available and used.
> 
> Hence add a helper function to check if PSCI is available.
> 
> This is useful for e.g. drivers that are used on platforms with and
> without PSCI.  Such drivers may need to take provisions for proper
> operation when PSCI is used, and/or to implement functionality that is
> usually provided by PSCI.

the psci_ops is a global var, why not check psci_ops.mmnn members
individually in each drivers? check IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW) for
building time ennoblement.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/psci.c | 5 +++++
>  include/linux/psci.h    | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> index da469c972b503f83..a3a11e2d8ffffaaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> @@ -670,6 +670,11 @@ int __init psci_dt_init(void)
>  	return init_fn(np);
>  }
>  
> +bool psci_is_available(void)
> +{
> +	return psci_ops.cpu_off && psci_ops.cpu_on && psci_ops.cpu_suspend;

IIRC, for PSCI 0.1, cpu_suspend is optional, we can't say the PSCI isn't
available if cpu_suspend is missing.

Thanks




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux