> > Isn't it SYS-DMAC compatible (sigh)? > > And to answer your question, it's a completely different IP than the > SYS-DMAC. It's still a multi-channel linked-list descriptor based system > like SYS-DMAC, but a complete different set of registers. > > However, it's a nice piece of IP so we'll probably continue to use it > for future RZ/A devices. When asking the question, I mixed up RZ/A with RZ/G, so I wondered why the latter has something different. For RZ/A, it is obvious to me that DMA has a different controller. Sorry about the fuzz!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
