Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A bugfix for the SMP case broke the build for the UP case:
>
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.o: In function `shmobile_boot_apmu':
> (.text+0x34): undefined reference to `secondary_startup'
>
> The assembler file mixes code that is used for SMP with code
> that we also need on a single-CPU build, so I'm leaving it
> always enabled in the Makefile, but enclose the SMP code
> in an #ifdef.
Oops, sorry for that. Looks like 0-day doesn't do UP builds?
> 3fd45a136ff6 ("ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: Make sure CNTVOFF is initialized on CA7/15")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> ;-)
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S
> index db4743d2bf91..5672b5849401 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S
As this hasn't been pulled into arm-soc yet (pull request sent though),
perhaps Simon should squash this fix into the original commit?
Should we rename headsmp-apmu.S to head-apmu.S?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
