Hi Chris,
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Compatible "r7s72102-ports" was added for RZ/A1L devices
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,rza1-pinctrl.txt | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,rza1-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,rza1-pinctrl.txt
> index 43e21474528a..2a3366cee848 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,rza1-pinctrl.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,rza1-pinctrl.txt
> @@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ Pin controller node
>
> Required properties:
> - compatible
> - this shall be "renesas,r7s72100-ports".
> + this shall be "renesas,r7s72100-ports" for RZ/A1H and RZ/A1M or
> + "renesas,r7s72102-ports" for RZ/A1L
Shouldn't you also document "renesas,r7s72101-ports" for RZ/A1M?
You could use "renesas,r7s72100-ports" as a fallback property for RZ/A1M,
though.
BTW, is there a way to distinguish the various RZ/A1 SoCs at runtime?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
