On 09/19/17 11:35, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 9/19/2017 12:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >>>> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Document the cec clock binding. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt | 4 ++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt >>>> index 06668bca7ffc..4497ae054d49 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt >>>> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ Optional properties: >>>> - adi,disable-timing-generator: Only for ADV7533. Disables the internal timing >>>> generator. The chip will rely on the sync signals in the DSI data lanes, >>>> rather than generate its own timings for HDMI output. >>>> +- clocks: from common clock binding: handle to CEC clock. >>> >>> It's called "phandle" in the DT speak. :-) >>> Are you sure the clock specifier would always be absent? >> >> Sorry? I don't understand the question. Did you mean: "can be absent?"? > > No, you only say that there'll be the clock phandle only. The clock > specifier may follow the phandle for the clock devices that have > "#clock-cells" prop != 0. I have to say that I just copy-and-pasted this from other bindings. Would this be better? - clocks: list of clock specifiers, corresponding to entries in the clock-names property; - clock-names: from common clock binding: must be "cec". Regards, Hans
