Hi Simon,
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 07:15:24PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Add a defconfig for Renesas R-Car Gen3 boards.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Not intended for upstream merge.
>>
>> Loosely based on arm64 defconfig, with support for non-Renesas SoCs and
>> boards removed, and missing support added.
>
> Thanks,
>
> this seems reasonable to me and I'm happy to maintain this driver,
> out of mainline, in a branch in the renesas tree - f.e. topic/defconfig.
>
> I am curious to know which tree you ran savedefconfig against.
> I tried renesas-devel-20170905-v4.13 and renesas-drivers-2017-09-05-v4.13
> but both seemed to generate a diff against the file created in your patch.
I used my current development tree, which is based on
renesas-drivers-2017-09-05-v4.13.
But I see no diff when running savedefconfig against the latter?
> I tested this defconfig against renesas-devel-20170905-v4.13 on
> a salvator-x/m3 ES1.0. It boots to user-space but I observed the following:
>
> [ 13.000428] sh-sci e6e88000.serial: dma_request_slave_channel failed
> [ 13.015167] sh-sci e6e88000.serial: dma_request_slave_channel failed
The scif2 node in r8a7796.dtsi doesn't have "dmas" properties.
These were removed from the datasheet, and scif2 has always been a bit
weird on R-Car Gen3...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
