On 14-08-17, 15:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I'm still a bit confused about your original comment when introducing this > file with the ever-growing table of SoCs: > > "And for new platforms we may do things differently as they are going > to use opp-v2 bindings." > > Hence I was under the impression the growing would be mitigated by new SoCs > using the opp-v2 bindings instead, and not needing an entry in the table. > > Perhaps I have misunderstood that comment? Not really. I have sent two patches to take care of your concerns. Do let me know if you have any concerns with them. -- viresh