On 3 August 2017 at 11:53, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:49:47AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> This reverts commit 785b215250310c690142abb1bdbb0767b8487c49. There is a >> secondary SDHI instance on Gen2 with has a 32-bit wide SDBUF register >> while all other registers are 16 bit apart. So, the logic used here does >> not apply and we need to rethink this and start cleanly from scratch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Extra info for Ulf: I can't work on that in the next days, so I thought > it would be good to ASAP fix the regression in mmc/next at least. > Instead of applying this revert, I decided to just drop the original commit from my next branch. While working on new version of how to deal with the 32/16 bit register correctly, please try to include Biju Das in the changelog as to give him cred from his help with testing. Kind regards Uffe
