RE: [PATCH 0/4] tmio/sdhi: use max sd_buf size & clean header file before

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I am having issues with this patch (commit id:-785b215250310c690142abb1bdbb0767b8487c49 " mmc: sdhi: use maximum width for the sdbuf register")
I am testing SDHI1 against linux-next-20170727 tag  with iWave RZ/G1M board which is identical to R-Car M2.

Getting below SDHI1 errors during boot. This issue is fixed by reverting this patch.

[   11.846211] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD51)
[   11.906243] mmc2: error -110 whilst initialising SD card
[   17.046328] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD5)
[   22.166212] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD5)
[   27.286205] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD5)
[   32.406204] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD5)
[   37.526209] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD55)
[   42.646206] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD55)
[   47.766203] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD55)
[   52.886204] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD55)
[   58.086208] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD52)
[   63.206204] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD5)
[   68.326205] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD5)
[   73.446204] sh_mobile_sdhi ee140000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD5)

Regards,
Biju

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-mmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mmc-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wolfram Sang
> Sent: 30 June 2017 11:57
> To: linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wolfram Sang
> <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH 0/4] tmio/sdhi: use max sd_buf size & clean header file before
>
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The main patch is patch 4 which uses the maximum sd_buf size, i.e. 32 bit on
> Gen2 and 64 bit on Gen3. Instead of a new flag, we use the bus_shift
> information we already have. See the patch description for details.
>
> Before fixing this, I wanted to remove a magic value in that function which is
> done in patch 3.
>
> When adding the new define, I noticed that some description is missing in the
> header which is fixed with patch 2.
>
> When adding the description, I noticed this meanwhile obsolete define which
> gets removed in patch 1.
>
> That's the way it went :)
>
> Tested on Salvator-X/M3-W and Lager/H2.
>
> Regards,
>
>    Wolfram
>
> Wolfram Sang (4):
>   mmc: tmio: remove obsolete TMIO_BBS
>   mmc: tmio: add references to bit defines in the header
>   mmc: tmio: no magic values when enabling DMA
>   mmc: sdhi: use maximum width for the sdbuf register
>
>  drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 5 ++---
>  drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h          | 7 +++++--
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body
> of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



Renesas Electronics Europe Ltd, Dukes Meadow, Millboard Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5FH, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Registered No. 04586709.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux