On 07/02/2017 10:19 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Marek, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Saturday 01 Jul 2017 22:04:51 Marek Vasut wrote: >> In case the initial values of the FOD registers are not configured in >> the OTP or by the bootloader, it is possible that the FOD registers >> will contain zeroes. The code in vc5_fod_recalc_rate() immediately >> feeds the FOD divider value obtained from the FOD registers into the >> div64_u64() and if the FOD divider value is zero, triggers division >> by zero exception. >> >> Check if the FOD divider value is zero and return the frequency of >> the FOD output as 0 Hz if it is so. This prevents the division by >> zero exception. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Alexey Firago <alexey_firago@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> on Salvator-XS with the display LVDS output. >> --- >> drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c b/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c >> index ea7d552a2f2b..60bf4afb51bd 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c >> @@ -426,6 +426,10 @@ static unsigned long vc5_fod_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw >> *hw, div_frc = (od_frc[0] << 22) | (od_frc[1] << 14) | >> (od_frc[2] << 6) | (od_frc[3] >> 2); >> >> + /* Avoid division by zero if the output is not configured. */ >> + if ((div_int == 0) && (div_frc == 0)) > > Inner parentheses are not needed. While I know they're not needed, I prefer to add those (and keep them) as it makes the expression easier to parse at a first glance IMO. > Apart from that, > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> + return 0; >> + >> /* The PLL divider has 12 integer bits and 30 fractional bits */ >> return div64_u64((u64)f_in << 24ULL, ((u64)div_int << 24ULL) + > div_frc); >> } > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut
