Hi Rich, Sato-san,
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Magnus reported that on sh7722/Migo-R, pinctrl registration fails with:
>
> sh-pfc pfc-sh7722: pin 0 already registered
> sh-pfc pfc-sh7722: error during pin registration
> sh-pfc pfc-sh7722: could not register: -22
> sh-pfc: probe of pfc-sh7722 failed with error -22
>
> pinmux_pins[] is initialized through PINMUX_GPIO(), using designated
> array initializers, where the GPIO_* enums serve as indices.
> Apparently GPIO_PTQ7 was defined in the enum, but never used.
> If enum values are defined, but never used, pinmux_pins[] contains
> (zero-filled) holes. Hence such entries are treated as pin zero, which
> was registered before, and pinctrl registration fails.
>
> I can't see how this ever worked, as at the time of commit f5e25ae52feff2dc
> ("sh-pfc: Add sh7722 pinmux support"), pinmux_gpios[] in
> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-sh7722.c already had the hole, and
> drivers/pinctrl/core.c already had the check.
>
> Some scripting revealed a few more broken drivers:
> - sh7757 has four holes, due to nonexistent GPIO_PT[JLNQ]7_RESV.
> - sh7264 and sh7269 define GPIO_PH[0-7], but don't use it with
> PINMUX_GPIO().
>
> Patch 1 fixes the issue on sh7722, and was tested.
> Patches 3-4 should fix the issue on the other 3 SoCs, but was untested due
> to lack of hardware.
>
> Changes compared to v1:
> - Replace fake error messages by references to sh7722,
> - Add Reviewed-by, Tested-by.
>
> Thanks for applying!
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven (4):
> sh: sh7722: Remove nonexistent GPIO_PTQ7 to fix pinctrl registration
> sh: sh7757: Remove nonexistent GPIO_PT[JLNQ]7_RESV to fix pinctrl
> registration
> sh: sh7264: Remove nonexistent GPIO_PH[0-7] to fix pinctrl
> registration
> sh: sh7269: Remove nonexistent GPIO_PH[0-7] to fix pinctrl
> registration
>
> arch/sh/include/cpu-sh2a/cpu/sh7264.h | 4 +---
> arch/sh/include/cpu-sh2a/cpu/sh7269.h | 4 +---
> arch/sh/include/cpu-sh4/cpu/sh7722.h | 2 +-
> arch/sh/include/cpu-sh4/cpu/sh7757.h | 8 ++++----
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Are these patches planned for inclusion in v4.13?
I don't see them in next-2016.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
