Re: [PATCH 6/7] [media] soc_camera: rcar_vin: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] [media] soc_camera: rcar_vin: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 14:02:02 +0200
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <a133a7f7-e887-5043-83d3-cccbec581487@cogentembedded.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

>    Why "soc_camera:" in the subject?

I used 'git log $file' and copied the most recent entry. Do I need to
resend?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 6/7] [media] soc_camera: rcar_vin: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
  - From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] tree-wide: use proper 'R-Car' product name
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- [PATCH 6/7] [media] soc_camera: rcar_vin: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH 6/7] [media] soc_camera: rcar_vin: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov