Hi Geert,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 2017-05-16 09:48:51 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Niklas Söderlund
> <niklas.soderlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2017-05-12 16:43:55 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Niklas Söderlund
> >> <niklas.soderlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On 2017-05-12 14:58:53 +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> >> >> On 2017-05-12 14:47:53 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> >> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Niklas Söderlund
> >> >> > <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> > When using PSCI suspend/resume, and Wake-on-LAN cannot work due to
> >> >> > PSCI firmware issues, Ethernet fails to come up afterwards:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ravb e6800000.ethernet eth0: failed to switch device to config mode
> >> >> > ravb e6800000.ethernet eth0: device will be stopped after h/w
> >> >> > processes are done.
> >> >> > ravb e6800000.ethernet eth0: failed to switch device to config mode
> >> >> > dpm_run_callback(): ravb_resume+0x0/0x148 returns -110
> >> >> > PM: Device e6800000.ethernet failed to resume: error -110
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Your resume routine cannot assume RAVB is in a sane mode, as it will
> >> >> > have been reset if PSCI suspend was used.
> >> >>
> >> >> Ouch, yes this is true thanks for reporting will look in to it.
> >> >>
> >> >> The problem is that in the resume handler if WoL is enabled it will try
> >> >> to close the device before reinitializing it from reset state. If WoL is
> >> >> not enabled the device will be closed at suspend time so no need to
> >> >> close it before restoring operation from reset in the resume handler.
>
> >> With renesas-drivers, it will refuse to use PSCI suspend if any other wake-up
> >> sources are configured, i.e. try
> >>
> >> echo disabled > /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6800000.ethernet/power/wakeup
> >>
> >> Good luck, and have a nice weekend!
> >
> > Thanks this allowed me to reproduce the same error as you. And after
> > future digging I don't believe the problem being in the logic of the
> > ravb suspend/resume functions. The problem is that the module clock is
> > never turned on after PCSI system suspend if its usage count is above 0
> > at suspend time, so the errors we both now observe are due to the module
> > clock being disabled.
> >
> > If I set DEBUG in renesas-cpg-mssr.c and observe when each module clock
> > is turned OFF and ON, the fault is clear. If WoL is enabled the clock is
> > never turned on when the system is resuming, while if WoL is disabled it
> > is. I verified this by removing the calls to clk_enable() and
> > clk_disable() from this patch, and by doing so the PCSI system suspend
> > works perfect with WoL enabled and the ravb comes up fine after toggling
> > SW23 (while ofc WoL no longer works in s2idle due to the module clock is
> > switched off at suspend time).
> >
> > I checked drivers/clk/renesas and I can't find a suspend/resume handler
> > for the clock driver, how is this intended to work? If a clock have a
> > usage count higher then 0 when the system is PSCI System Suspended it
> > seems like it won't be turned back on when the system is resumed from
> > this sleep stage. I might have misunderstood something and I need to
> > alter the logic in the ravb driver to let the clock driver know it
> > should turn on the clock at resume time?
>
> Ah, you found a real use case for suspend/resume support in the clock
> drivers ;-)
Happy to be of service ;-)
>
> Due to PSCI system suspend powering down the whole SoC, all clock
> settings are lost.
>
> Thanks, I will look into this...
Thanks!
>
> > Whit all this being said I still like to withdraw this patch as I found
> > another fault with it, ravb_wol_restore() will unconditionally be called
> > while ravb_wol_setup() will only be called if netif_running(ndev). This
> > is en easy fix and I will send out a v2 once we figure out what to do
> > about the clock.
>
> The clock issue is external to the ravb driver. If it works with
> s2idle, it should
> be OK.
Do you think it's a good idea to move ahead with a v2 of the ravb WoL
patch to fix the unrelated issue and aim for it to be picked up prior to
suspend/resume support is added to the CPG/MSSR?
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
