Hi Jacopo,
On Wednesday 03 May 2017 18:14:03 jmondi wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:06:19PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 May 2017 11:52:36 jmondi wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 02:47:14PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> Hi Jacopo,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for the patch.
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>>> +/**
> >>>> + * Collect formats supported by CEU and sensor subdevice
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +static int sh_ceu_init_active_formats(struct sh_ceu_dev *pcdev)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct v4l2_subdev *sensor = pcdev->sensor;
> >>>> + struct sh_ceu_fmt *active_fmts;
> >>>> + unsigned int n_active_fmts;
> >>>> + struct sh_ceu_fmt *fmt;
> >>>> + unsigned int i;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum mbus_code = {
> >>>> + .which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE,
> >>>> + .index = 0,
> >>>> + };
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* Count how may formats are supported by CEU and sensor
> >>>> subdevice */
> >>>> + n_active_fmts = 0;
> >>>> + while (!v4l2_subdev_call(sensor, pad, enum_mbus_code,
> >>>> + NULL, &mbus_code)) {
> >>>> + mbus_code.index++;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + fmt = get_ceu_fmt_from_mbus(mbus_code.code);
> >>>
> >>> This is not correct. You will get one one pixel format per media bus
> >>> format supported by the sensor. The CEU supports
> >>>
> >>> 1. converting packed YUV 4:2:2 (YUYV) to YUV 4:2:2 planar (CAMCR.JPG =
> >>> 00) or capturing raw data (CAMCR.JPG = 01)
> >>>
> >>> 2. outputting YUV 4:2:2 planar to memory (CDOCR.CDS = 1) or
> >>> downsampling it to YUV 4:2:0 planar (CDOCR.CDS = 0)
> >>>
> >>> 3. swapping bytes, words and long words at the output (CDOCR.COLS,
> >>> CDOCR.COWS and CDOCR.COBS fields)
> >>>
> >>> This effectively allows to
> >>>
> >>> - capture the raw data produced by the sensor
> >>> - capture YUV images produced by the sensor in packed YUV 4:2:2
> >>> format, from any Y/U/V order to any Y/U/V order
> >>> - capture YUV images produced by the sensor in planar YUV 4:2:2 or
> >>> planar YUV 4:2:0, from any Y/U/V order to any Y/U/V order
> >>>
> >>> The list of formats you create needs to reflect that. This means that
> >>>
> >>> - if the sensor can produce a packed YUV 4:2:2 format, the CEU will be
> >>> able to output YUYV, UYVY, YVYU, VYUY, NV12, NV21, NV16 and NV16
> >>>
> >>> - for every non-YUV format produced by the sensor, the CEU will be
> >>> able to output raw data
> >>>
> >>> The former is easy. You just need to list the formats produced by the
> >>> sensor, and if one of them is packed YUV 4:2:2, flag that in the
> >>> sh_ceu_dev structure, and allow all the above output YUV formats. You
> >>> don't need to create an instance-specific list of those formats in the
> >>> sh_ceu_dev structure, as they will be either all available or all
> >>> non-available.
> >>>
> >>> The latter is a bit more complex, you need a list of media bus code to
> >>> pixel format in the driver. I'd recommend counting the non-YUV packed
> >>> formats produced by the sensor, allocating an array of sh_ceu_fmt
> >>> pointers with that number of entries, and make each entry point to the
> >>> corresponding entry in the global sh_ceu_fmts array. The global
> >>> sh_ceu_fmts needs to be extended with common sensor formats (raw Bayer
> >>> and JPEG come to mind).
> >>>
> >>> If all sensors currently used with the CEU can produce packed YUV, you
> >>> could implement YUV support only to start with, leaving raw capture
> >>> support for later.
> >>
> >> Ok, thanks for explaining.
> >>
> >> I have a proposal here, as the original driver only supported "image
> >> fetch mode" (ie. It accepts data in YUYV with components ordering
> >> arbitrary swapped) as a first step we may want to replicate this,
> >> ignoring data synch fetch mode (Chris, you have a driver for this you are
> >> already using in your BSP so I guess it's less urgent to support it,
> >> right?).
> >>
> >> Also, regarding output memory format I am sure we can produce planar
> >> formats as NV12/21 and NV16/61, but I'm not sure I have found a way to
> >> output packed YUVY (and its permutations) to memory, if not considering
> >> it a binary format, as thus using data synch fetch mode.
> >
> > As I understand it, outputting packed YUV is indeed done using data synch
> > (or enable, I'd have to check) fetch mode, and swapping components to
> > convert between different YUYV orders is done through the CDOCR.COLS,
> > CDOCR.COWS and CDOCR.COBS bits.
>
> That's waht I wanted to have confirmed, thanks.
>
> >> So, as a first step my proposal is the following one:
> >> Accept any YUYV bus format from sensor, and support planar ones as
> >> memory output formats with down-sampling support (NV12/21 and NV16/61
> >> then).
> >
> > You can start with that, but from the same YUV bus format, you should be
> > able to output packed YUV easily using data sync fetch mode. That can be
> > implemented as a second step, it will just result in extending the
> > hardcoded list of YUV pixel formats supported by the driver (as any YUV
> > bus format can produce any of the four NV variants and any of the four
> > packed YUV variants).
>
> As a reference, I think it's data fetch sync mode. Data enable sync mode is
> not even supported on RZ/A1H.
>
> > The third step would be to enumerate the non-YUV formats supported by the
> > sensor, and create a list of corresponding pixel formats that can be
> > supported in data sync fetch mode. I'd leave that out for now.
> >
> > So, if you only implement the first two steps, you don't need to create a
> > list of supported YUV formats at runtime, you only need to ensure that
> > the sensor supports one YUV bus format, and you can hardcode support for
> > all 8 YUV pixel formats in the CEU driver.
>
> mmm, yes, actually there are many combinations leading to the same
> result here... Ie. if I have to output NV21 and the sensor can produce YUYV
> and YVYU it may be better to select the latter to avoid data swapping
> on CEU side.. Or maybe I can just ignore it and chose the first YUYV format
> the sensor provides and manipulate it on the CEU.
I think that would be simpler. Data swapping on the CEU side doesn't cost
anything.
> >> The way I am building the supported format list is indeed wrong, and
> >> as you suggested I should just try to make sure the sensor can output
> >> a YUV422 bus format. From there I can output planar memory formats.
> >>
> >> One last thing, I am not that sure how I can produce NV21/61 from
> >> bus formats that do not already present the CbCr components in the
> >> desired order (which is Cr then Cb for NV61/21)
> >> Eg. Can I produce NV21 from YUYV though byte/word/long word swapping
> >> (CDOCR.COLS/CDOCR.COWS/CDOCR.COBS) ? Won't I be swapping the luminance
> >> components as well (see figure 46.45 in RZ/A1H TRM).
> >
> > No, the way the accommodate different YUYV orders at the input when
> > outputting an NV format is through the CAMCR.DTARY field. The
> > CDOCR.CO[LWB]S fields control data swapping at the output, before writing
> > data to memory.
>
> That's waht I meant....
Yes, but my point was that CDOCR.CO[LWB]S will result in swapping everything,
luminance included as you pointed out, so it can't be used to change the U and
V order. The right way to do it is as described just below.
> > You should set the CAMCR.DTARY field to the order output by the sensor if
> > you want to generate NV12 or NV16. For NV21 or NV61, just fool the CEU by
> > pretending the sensor swaps U and V. For instance, if the sensor produces
> > YUYV but you set CAMCR.DTARY to YVYU, the U and V components will be
> > swapped at the input interface, and the NV12 output will become NV21.
>
> Ah, neat hack!
> I can now throw away the last three hours of coding, where I tried to
> match the sensor provided components ordering with the resulting
> memory output format... thank you :)
You're welcome :-) I don't think it's even a hack, I believe that's how the
device is intended to be used.
> >> If I cannot do that, I should restrict swapped planar format
> >> availability based on the ability of the sensor to produce
> >> chrominance components in the desired order
> >> (Eg. If the sensor does not support producing YVYU I cannot produce
> >> NV21 or NV61). Is this ok?
> >
> > That would be OK if there was no way to swap U and V, but as you can, you
> > can output all formats :-)
>
> I'll try this...
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
