On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 01:18:58PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> Less important than in user-visible messages, but still good practice as
>> there's still no excuse for ARM64 code to look like it was written before
>> 1996.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi David,
>
> I'd be happy to take the Renesas portions of this change if they were
> broken out into a separate patch. The reason I would prefer a separate
> patch is to avoid the possibility of conflicts, even trivial ones.
s/possibility/reality/, unless this series goes in before v4.12-rc1.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
