Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7791: add R8A7743 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

On 04/03/2017 11:13 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

Renesas RZ/G1M (R8A7743) is pin compatible with R-Car M2-W/N (R8A7791/3),
however it doesn't have several automotive specific peripherals. Along
with adding 'struct sh_pfc_soc_info' for R8A7743, annotate  all  items
that only exist on the R-Car SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your (big) patch!

   My pleasure. :-)

--- linux-pinctrl.orig/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7791.c
+++ linux-pinctrl/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7791.c
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 /*
- * r8a7791 processor support - PFC hardware block.
+ * r8a7791/r8a7743 processor support - PFC hardware block.
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2013 Renesas Electronics Corporation
- * Copyright (C) 2014-2015 Cogent Embedded, Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2014-2017 Cogent Embedded, Inc.
  *
  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
  * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
@@ -129,11 +129,12 @@ enum {
        FN_A9, FN_MSIOF1_SS2, FN_I2C0_SDA,
        FN_A10, FN_MSIOF1_TXD, FN_MSIOF1_TXD_D,
        FN_A11, FN_MSIOF1_RXD, FN_I2C3_SCL_D, FN_MSIOF1_RXD_D,
-       FN_A12, FN_FMCLK, FN_I2C3_SDA_D, FN_MSIOF1_SCK_D,
-       FN_A13, FN_ATAG0_N_C, FN_BPFCLK, FN_MSIOF1_SS1_D,
-       FN_A14, FN_ATADIR0_N_C, FN_FMIN, FN_FMIN_C, FN_MSIOF1_SYNC_D,
-       FN_A15, FN_BPFCLK_C,
-       FN_A16, FN_DREQ2_B, FN_FMCLK_C, FN_SCIFA1_SCK_B,
+       FN_A12, FN_FMCLK /* R8A779x only */, FN_I2C3_SDA_D, FN_MSIOF1_SCK_D,
+       FN_A13, FN_ATAG0_N_C, FN_BPFCLK /* R8A779x only */, FN_MSIOF1_SS1_D,
+       FN_A14, FN_ATADIR0_N_C, FN_FMIN /* R8A779x only */,
+       FN_FMIN_C /* R8A779x only */, FN_MSIOF1_SYNC_D,
+       FN_A15, FN_BPFCLK_C /* R8A779x only */,
+       FN_A16, FN_DREQ2_B, FN_FMCLK_C /* R8A779x only */, FN_SCIFA1_SCK_B,

I don't know if it's worth annotating all bits...

@@ -1702,7 +1789,7 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_pin pinmux_pi
        PINMUX_GPIO_GP_ALL(),
 };

-/* - ADI -------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/* - ADI (R8A779x only) ----------------------------------------------------- */
 static const unsigned int adi_common_pins[] = {
        /* ADIDATA, ADICS/SAMP, ADICLK */
        RCAR_GP_PIN(6, 24), RCAR_GP_PIN(6, 25), RCAR_GP_PIN(6, 26),

... and pins (and groups and register bit fields), as they're used
only indirectly.

   As I've said already (on IRC?), I was aiming at a self-documented driver.

@@ -4420,14 +4507,14 @@ static const unsigned int vin2_clk_mux[]
 };

 static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[] = {
-       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_common),
-       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel0),
-       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel1),
-       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel2),
-       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_common_b),
-       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel0_b),
-       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel1_b),
-       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel2_b),
+       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_common),   /* R8A779x only */
+       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel0),   /* R8A779x only */
+       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel1),   /* R8A779x only */
+       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel2),   /* R8A779x only */
+       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_common_b), /* R8A779x only */
+       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel0_b), /* R8A779x only */
+       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel1_b), /* R8A779x only */
+       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(adi_chsel2_b), /* R8A779x only */
        SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(audio_clk_a),
        SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(audio_clk_b),
        SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(audio_clk_b_b),
@@ -4524,7 +4611,7 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pin
        SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(intc_irq1),
        SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(intc_irq2),
        SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(intc_irq3),
-       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(mlb_3pin),
+       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(mlb_3pin),     /* R8A7794 only */

R8A779x ;-)

   Oops, so this one did slip thru... :-(

        SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(mmc_data1),
        SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(mmc_data4),
        SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(mmc_data8),

@@ -5288,7 +5377,7 @@ static const char * const vin2_groups[]
 };

 static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[] = {
-       SH_PFC_FUNCTION(adi),
+       SH_PFC_FUNCTION(adi),           /* R8A779x only */
        SH_PFC_FUNCTION(audio_clk),
        SH_PFC_FUNCTION(avb),
        SH_PFC_FUNCTION(can0),
@@ -5308,7 +5397,7 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_function pinm
        SH_PFC_FUNCTION(iic0),
        SH_PFC_FUNCTION(iic1),
        SH_PFC_FUNCTION(intc),
-       SH_PFC_FUNCTION(mlb),
+       SH_PFC_FUNCTION(mlb),           /* R8A779x only */
        SH_PFC_FUNCTION(mmc),
        SH_PFC_FUNCTION(msiof0),
        SH_PFC_FUNCTION(msiof1),

For pinmux_groups[] and pinmux_functions[] I agree they should be annotated.

However, you could achieve the same by using separate arrays for r8a7791
and r8a7743, with the added benefits that users cannot select nonexisting groups
and functions, and that only existing groups and functions are exposed
through debugfs
(/sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/e6060000.pfc/pin{conf-groups,groups,mux-functions}).

   I didn't know about debugfs...

Alternatively, you could share the arrays by putting the common entries first,
and the r8a7791/3-only entries last, and restricting r8a7743 to the common
subsets by filling in a lower values in r8a7743_pinmux_info.nr_groups resp.
r8a7743_pinmux_info.nr_functions.
Currently groups and functions do not have to be sorted, so this should work.
I'm not aware of a safe and simple way of filling in .nr_groups resp.
.nr_functions, and make sure everything stays in sync, except perhaps by
creating a struct:

        static const struct {
                struct sh_pfc_function common[<n>];
                struct sh_pfc_function r8a7791[];
        } pinmux_functions;

and manually updating <n> when changing the initializers?
Then at least the compiler will complain when adding (not when
removing) entries.

Both alternatives allow to add #ifdefs to the pinmux_groups[] and
pinmux_functions[] arrays (and __maybe_unused to referred arrays) to reduce
kernel size when not enabling support for all SoCs.

   I'll give that a thought...

[...]
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

MBR, Sergei




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux