Hi! > From: Sergei Shtylyov > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 8:57 PM > > On 03/13/2017 12:39 PM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > > This patch fixes an issue that this driver doesn't take care of the runtime > > PM. This code assumed that devm_phy_create() called pm_runtime_enable(dev), > > but it misunderstood the dev_phy_create()'s specification. > > This driver should call its own pm_runtime_pm() before dev_phy_create(). > > You probably meant pm_runtime_enable()? Sorry for not noticing the 1st time... Yes, I meant pm_runtime_enable(). Thank you for the review again and again. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda
