On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:27:25PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Ulrich Hecht > <ulrich.hecht+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi > > index c5f0df5..782063a 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi > > @@ -430,6 +430,9 @@ > > <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7796_CLK_S3D1>, > > <&scif_clk>; > > clock-names = "fck", "brg_int", "scif_clk"; > > + dmas = <&dmac1 0x51>, <&dmac1 0x50>, > > + <&dmac2 0x51>, <&dmac2 0x50>; > > + dma-names = "tx", "rx", "tx", "rx"; > > power-domains = <&sysc R8A7796_PD_ALWAYS_ON>; > > status = "disabled"; > > Apparently the DMA properties were added to the HSCIF nodes instead > of the SCIF nodes while applying this patch? > > 3 lines of context is not sufficient to distinguish between the various SCIF > and HSCIF nodes :-( Thanks, I have updated renesas-devel accordingly. I notice in renesas-devel there seems to be one "tx", "rx" DMA per SCIF rather than two added in Ulrich's patch. Is there a reason for that?
