On 22/02/17 13:47, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: [...] >> >> IIUC, it's not implemented today. I can't talk about future ;), but your > > Good, so there's no need for the DT property, and drivers/firmware/psci.c > should aways call do_cpu_idle() instead of PSCI SYSTEM_SUSPEND if any > other wake-up sources are configured? > No. > That follows the principle of least surprise: it doesn't leave the user with > a system that won't wake up the way he configured it to wake up. > But he can still wake up with the "switch" so there's no surprise. He just need to better understand his system before playing with it ;) -- Regards, Sudeep
