* Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2017-02-21 08:59:18 +0100]:
Hi Geert,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Matthew Giassa <matthew@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please pardon the earlier e-mail which was missing the changelog text.
This line should be between the "---" and the diffstat below.
Thank you.
Some additional style changes to appease checkpatch.
Which additional style changes?
* Aligning function parameters in the function prototypes.
* Removing "double newlines". where checkpatch warns about them.
* Spaces between macro names, '+', and integer literals.
* Swapped out some line comments with C-style equivalent.
* Removing trailing spaces.
---
drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_ioctl.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_ioctl.h b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_ioctl.h
index 84554b6..00eec18 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_ioctl.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_ioctl.h
#include "ks_wlan.h"
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
-int ks_wlan_read_config_file(struct ks_wlan_private *priv);
-int ks_wlan_setup_parameter(struct ks_wlan_private *priv,
- unsigned int commit_flag);
+int ks_wlan_read_config_file(
+ struct ks_wlan_private *priv);
+int ks_wlan_setup_parameter(
+ struct ks_wlan_private *priv,
+ unsigned int commit_flag);
Really?
If checkpatch complained about the above, you should file a bug report
against checkpatch.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
It seems to be a very deliberate message from checkpatch, complaining
about the alignment of the beginning of individual function parameters
in the prototype. The only two configurations which appeased it was the
changes I put in above, or a combination of hard-tabs (8-wide, noexpand)
and spaces, which I thought was ugly.
--
Matthew
