Hi Dong, On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:02 AM, DongCV <cv-dong@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Dong <cv-dong@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch fixes the output warning logs and data loss when > performing mount/umount then remount the device with jffs2 format. > > This is the warning logs when performing mount/umount then remount the device with jffs2 format: > "root@linaro-naro:~# mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock2 /mnt/media > [ 3839.928013] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b40000: 0x1900 instead > [ 3839.956515] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b40004: 0x000c instead > [ 3839.985009] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b40008: 0xb0b1 instead > [ 3840.013591] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b4000c: 0x1900 instead > [ 3840.042087] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b40010: 0x0044 instead > [ 3840.070566] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b40014: 0xfb1d instead > [ 3840.099159] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b40018: 0x0002 instead > [ 3840.127604] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b4001c: 0x0001 instead > [ 3840.156043] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b40020: 0x81a4 instead > [ 3840.184472] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x03b4002c: 0x6529 instead > [ 3840.212900] jffs2: Further such events for this erase block will not be printed > [ 3840.322915] jffs2: notice: (2008) read_dnode: node CRC failed on dnode at 0x3b40080: read 0xc40b5dfc, calculated 0x264be003 > root@linaro-naro[ 3840.356857] jffs2: warning: (2008) jffs2_do_read_inode_internal: no data nodes found for ino #2 > :~# [ 3840.386659] jffs2: Returned error for crccheck of ino #2. Expect badness... > > Signed-off-by: Dong <cv-dong@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c > index 9daf500..2ee1301 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c > @@ -848,7 +848,6 @@ static int qspi_transfer_in(struct rspi_data *rspi, struct spi_transfer *xfer) > ret = rspi_pio_transfer(rspi, NULL, rx, n); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > - *rx++ = ret; > } > n -= len; > } Apart from sending patches inline, my comments from https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-spi/msg09753.html are still valid. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
