RE: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] arm64: mm: Silently allow devices lacking IOMMU group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Robin,

>> Consider failure of iommu_get_domain_for_dev() as non-critical and
>> get rid of the warning printout. This allows IOMMU properties to be
>> included in the DTB even though the kernel is configured with
>> CONFIG_IOMMU_API=n or in case a particular IOMMU driver refuses to
>> enable IOMMU support for a certain slave device and returns error
>> from the ->add_device() callback.
>>
>> This is only a cosmetic change that removes console warning printouts.
>
>The warning is there for a reason - at this point, we *expected* the
>device to be using an IOMMU for DMA, so a failure is significant. Rather
>than masking genuine failures in other cases because your case
>deliberately breaks that expectation, simply change the expectation -
>i.e. rather than letting of_xlate() succeed then failing add_device()
>later, reject the of_xlate() call up-front such that the DMA layer never
>gets told about the IOMMU in the first place.
>
>Robin.
>

With the iommu probe deferral patches, this behavior would change
where the arch_setup_dma_ops would never be called if there is
an error from xlate or add_device. But also the error value from
xlate/add_device is returned back and the probe of the device
would fail for any error. So if there can be cases like above, where
the xlate/add_device callbacks can return error for specific reasons,
should only EPROBE_DEFER be considered and rest of the errors
be filtered out with a WARN probably ?

Regards,
 Sricharan


>> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>>  arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c |   10 +++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> --- 0001/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ work/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c	2017-01-23 20:54:40.060607110 +0900
>> @@ -827,11 +827,19 @@ static bool do_iommu_attach(struct devic
>>  	struct iommu_domain *domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
>>
>>  	/*
>> +	 * In case IOMMU support is excluded from the kernel or if the device
>> +	 * is not hooked up to any IOMMU group then be silent and keep the
>> +	 * old dma_ops.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!domain)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	/*
>>  	 * If the IOMMU driver has the DMA domain support that we require,
>>  	 * then the IOMMU core will have already configured a group for this
>>  	 * device, and allocated the default domain for that group.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (!domain || iommu_dma_init_domain(domain, dma_base, size, dev)) {
>> +	if (iommu_dma_init_domain(domain, dma_base, size, dev)) {
>>  		pr_warn("Failed to set up IOMMU for device %s; retaining platform DMA ops\n",
>>  			dev_name(dev));
>>  		return false;
>> _______________________________________________
>> iommu mailing list
>> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>iommu mailing list
>iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux